WhatsApp
Axial Flux Core LogoAxial Flux Core
  • Home
  • Contact Us
Start inquiry
Axial Flux Core LogoAxial Flux Core
Axial Flux Core LogoAxial Flux Core

SMC axial flux motor core and AFPM stator OEM support for advanced electric drive teams.

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Email app

Attach STEP/DXF/PDF plus frequency, flux density, sample quantity, annual forecast, and destination.

Instant Chat

+8618857971991

Chat on WhatsApp

Direct response from our engineering team.

Core Products
  • Product Portfolio
  • Axial Flux Motor Core
  • AFPM SMC Stator
  • SMC Stator Segments
  • YASA Segmented Stator Teeth
  • 3D Isotropic Flux Core
  • Lamination & Winding Services
  • Custom Compaction Tooling
Applications
  • Applications Overview
  • eVTOL Axial Flux Cores
  • Humanoid Joint Stators
  • Drone Propulsion Cores
  • EV Supercar AFPM Cores
  • Compact Generator Cores
Manufacturing & Quality
  • OEM Capability Hub
  • Technology & Materials
  • SMC Core Manufacturing
  • Manufacturing & Quality
  • Axial Flux Stator Prototyping
  • Compaction Tooling DFM
  • Magnetic Loss Validation
  • AFPM Air Gap Design Tool
Resources
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact / RFQ
  • Engineering Resources
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 Axial Flux Core. All Rights Reserved.|Backed by Linkup Ai Co., Ltd. with axial flux core manufacturing support in Shenzhen and Dongguan, China.
Legal entity: Linkup Ai Co., Ltd.
Engineering Resources

RFQ and validation templates for axial flux core sourcing

Use these document-first templates to align drawings, magnetic targets, inspection files, traceability, and export packaging before sample approval or pilot release.

Send RFQ EmailQuality controls

1. RFQ baseline

Start with CAD status, part envelope, application target, magnetic operating point, sample quantity, and destination.

2. Evidence scope

Decide which files matter for the current gate: dimensional report, density check, magnetic test, insulation check, coating record, or packaging file.

3. Release boundary

Tie every accepted result to drawing revision, sample ID, material lot, inspection method, test condition, and buyer acceptance rule.

Download Templates

Prepare the evidence buyers ask for before tooling release.

These PDF-first files give engineering, quality, and sourcing teams a cleaner buyer-facing artifact. Markdown source copies remain available when teams need to paste the fields into their own RFQ, supplier-quality, or project review systems.

Axial Flux Core RFQ Worksheet

A copy-ready buyer worksheet for CAD status, motor topology, magnetic targets, quantity, and destination inputs.

Best use
Use before first contact when sourcing, engineering, and procurement need the same RFQ baseline.
Acceptance focus
Reduces clarification loops by separating drawing, operating point, validation, and logistics inputs.

Buyer inputs

  • CAD or drawing revision status
  • Motor topology and package envelope
  • Target frequency, flux density, torque, or duty cycle
  • Sample, pilot, and annual volume assumptions

Supplier return

  • Manufacturing route recommendation
  • Feasibility questions tied to drawing features
  • Validation files required before sample release

Review risks

  • RFQ quotes based on incomplete magnetic targets
  • Prototype price without validation scope
  • Packaging or destination left until shipment

Example acceptance language

Supplier response should separate feasibility assumptions, open engineering questions, sample lead time, validation scope, and export packaging responsibility before price is treated as comparable.

Request reviewDownload PDFMarkdown source

First Article Inspection Checklist

A practical FAI planning checklist for drawing revision, CTQ dimensions, datum plan, and sample measurement release.

Best use
Use when prototype parts are moving toward buyer-side design release or pilot purchase review.
Acceptance focus
Connects each inspected result to the drawing revision, sample ID, method, and pass or review status.

Buyer inputs

  • Controlled drawing and CTQ dimensions
  • Datum scheme and measurement method preference
  • Sample quantity and sample ID convention
  • Pass, conditional pass, and review rules

Supplier return

  • Dimensional report by sample ID
  • Measurement method and equipment note
  • Nonconformance disposition and corrective action owner

Review risks

  • FAI detached from the latest drawing revision
  • Only summary pass/fail without measured values
  • Unclear rule for buyer-side conditional release

Example acceptance language

Each CTQ result should identify drawing revision, sample ID, inspection method, measured value, tolerance, and release status before pilot build approval.

Request reviewDownload PDFMarkdown source

Magnetic Validation Report Template

A report skeleton for B-H curve, permeability, core-loss, insulation, or project-specific magnetic checks.

Best use
Use before sample PO when the team needs agreement on frequency, flux density, temperature, and sample geometry.
Acceptance focus
Prevents generic material claims by tying validation data to the actual test condition and acceptance rule.

Buyer inputs

  • Target B-H curve or material grade basis
  • Frequency, flux density, and temperature points
  • Sample geometry and winding or fixture assumptions
  • Core-loss, permeability, insulation, or saturation criteria

Supplier return

  • Test condition table
  • Raw or summarized magnetic result file
  • Deviation note when fixture or geometry differs from buyer use

Review risks

  • Generic datasheet values presented as sample data
  • Missing temperature or frequency conditions
  • Acceptance criteria defined after the test is complete

Example acceptance language

Magnetic results should be accepted only when frequency, flux density, temperature, sample geometry, and fixture assumptions match the agreed validation scope or are clearly marked as deviations.

Request reviewDownload PDFMarkdown source

Material and Process Traceability Template

A traceability record outline for material lot, compaction route, thermal process, coating, and revision control.

Best use
Use for OEM qualification, pilot transfer, or repeat-order control where auditability matters.
Acceptance focus
Keeps material, process, inspection, and shipment records tied to one controlled program baseline.

Buyer inputs

  • Drawing, material, and process revision baseline
  • Powder lot, compaction, heat treatment, and coating fields
  • Density, insulation, or dimensional checkpoints
  • Retention and release requirements for repeat orders

Supplier return

  • Lot-linked material and route record
  • Process parameter summary by batch
  • Change-control notice for material or route deviation

Review risks

  • Traceability starts only at finished goods
  • Process changes not linked to buyer approval
  • Repeat order lacks revision comparison

Example acceptance language

Repeat-order release should reference the controlled drawing, material route, batch record, inspection checkpoint, and any approved deviation from the last accepted baseline.

Request reviewDownload PDFMarkdown source

Export Packaging Checklist

A shipment release checklist for rust prevention, part separation, cushioning, labeling, and destination risk.

Best use
Use before sample or pilot shipment when fragile SMC geometry, corrosion risk, or overseas transit can affect acceptance.
Acceptance focus
Turns packaging from an afterthought into a documented release condition for buyer receiving inspection.

Buyer inputs

  • Part sensitivity and allowed contact points
  • Rust prevention, humidity, and storage expectations
  • Labeling, carton, pallet, and destination requirements
  • Receiving inspection and photo-record preference

Supplier return

  • Packaging release checklist
  • Label and packing list confirmation
  • Damage, corrosion, or shortage response path

Review risks

  • Bare parts contact each other in transit
  • Packaging photos missing before dispatch
  • Labels do not match buyer receiving workflow

Example acceptance language

Shipment release should require part separation, corrosion protection, label verification, packing photo record, and destination-specific handling notes before dispatch.

Request reviewDownload PDFMarkdown source

Public Proof Boundary

The current site can use templates, checklists, and review scopes as trust assets. It should not present planned evidence as finished supplier proof.

  • Templates are buyer-preparation tools, not certified reports or production certificates.
  • Real release files should be issued only after drawing, material route, sample ID, and test condition are confirmed.
  • Public claims should not mention certified performance, customer approval, or batch evidence unless the underlying file exists.

Related Review Pages

  • Contact / RFQ for sending project inputs and drawings.
  • Manufacturing & Quality for inspection, validation, and packaging controls.
  • Technology & Materials for SMC grade, density, B-H curve, and core-loss planning.

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Email app

Attach STEP/DXF/PDF plus frequency, flux density, sample quantity, annual forecast, and destination.

Instant Chat

+8618857971991

Chat on WhatsApp

Direct response from our engineering team.