Meet the SMC axial flux core manufacturing team supporting NDA-safe RFQ review, tooling DFM, validation evidence, and AFPM stator supply.
Our focus is soft magnetic composite core manufacturing, compaction tooling, prototype DFM, and validation support for axial flux machines where conventional laminated stacks struggle with three-dimensional flux paths.
Backed by Linkup Ai Co., Ltd. with axial flux core manufacturing support in Shenzhen and Dongguan, China. We serve as a dedicated SMC axial flux core manufacturing partner focused on AFPM stators, 3D flux paths, and advanced electric drive OEM projects.
Support from electromagnetic intent and SMC geometry review to compaction tooling DFM, prototype validation, and production transition.
Process quality control, magnetic performance records, export packaging, and shipment coordination aligned with customer lead-time targets.
Advanced motor buyers rarely evaluate a supplier from one angle. The About page now frames the company profile as a due-diligence checklist, not a generic brand story.
Can this supplier understand our AFPM topology and SMC risks?
DFM discussion, material route boundary, magnetic validation scope, tooling assumptions, and open geometry risks.
Can prototype evidence become repeatable release evidence?
Drawing revision control, first article fields, density and dimensional records, traceability fields, and packaging release notes.
Can the supplier quote without hiding risk in vague terms?
RFQ input checklist, sample/pilot/repeat-order gates, tooling ownership discussion, quantity plan, destination, and Incoterm assumptions.
Can confidential CAD and customer-owned designs stay bounded?
NDA status, reviewer list, file handoff rule, OEM/ODM boundary, controlled drawing IDs, and customer approval before public reuse.
| Capability Area | What We Support | Buyer Value |
|---|---|---|
| Core Coverage | SMC stators, segmented teeth, flux concentrators, and custom 3D magnetic components | One-vendor coordination across prototype AFPM core families. |
| Customization | Tooth geometry, compaction die review, post-machining allowance, and assembly features | Reduces prototype rework and manufacturability risk. |
| Validation | Density, dimensional, magnetic loss, insulation, and thermal check evidence | Supports decision-ready prototype qualification gates. |
| Quality & Delivery | Process checkpoints, material traceability, export execution planning | Improves repeat-order predictability and audit readiness. |
The safest RFQ path separates public screening, NDA-controlled engineering review, and sample-specific evidence. That gives the buyer useful feedback while protecting unreleased CAD, customer-owned drawings, and program IP.
Useful to share
Application, approximate envelope, target frequency, flux-density range, project stage, quantity plan, and destination.
Keep controlled
No customer-confidential CAD, unreleased motor architecture, or controlled drawing package is required at this step.
Useful to share
STEP, DXF, 2D PDF, revision IDs, CTQ dimensions, sample geometry, material target, and validation conditions.
Keep controlled
Allowed reviewers, sharing limits, file list, drawing ownership, and change-control expectations should be written before handoff.
Useful to share
DFM notes, sample ID records, FAI fields, density or magnetic validation scope, traceability summary, and export packaging checklist.
Keep controlled
Issued reports, customer names, application photos, and formal release files remain project-specific unless explicitly approved.
Until real certificates, signed reports, customer approvals, and sample records exist in the project file, the public site should describe what can be prepared and what must be generated after scope agreement.
Capability matrix, RFQ worksheet, FAI checklist, traceability template, packaging checklist, and buyer-side review language.
Quote assumptions, DFM questions, sample-specific inspection records, magnetic validation conditions, and shipment release notes.
Signed reports, certification scans, customer case studies, customer drawings, application photos, or regulated release evidence.
These files turn supplier screening into a checklist: commercial context, sample release, process traceability, and export packaging. They are preparation files, not issued reports or certifications.
Reduces clarification loops by separating drawing, operating point, validation, and logistics inputs.
Download PDFConnects each inspected result to the drawing revision, sample ID, method, and pass or review status.
Download PDFKeeps material, process, inspection, and shipment records tied to one controlled program baseline.
Download PDFTurns packaging from an afterthought into a documented release condition for buyer receiving inspection.
Download PDFThe site is positioned for OEM manufacturing collaboration around SMC axial flux motor cores, AFPM stators, tooling DFM, validation support, and supply execution. Customer-provided drawings and program IP should remain controlled by the buyer unless a separate ODM scope is explicitly agreed.
A public first-contact review can use non-confidential application context, envelope targets, operating points, and quantity assumptions. Controlled STEP, DXF, 2D PDF, customer drawings, or unreleased motor architecture should move through an NDA-controlled handoff.
The public site provides preparation templates for RFQ, first article inspection, material-process traceability, magnetic validation, and export packaging. Project-specific evidence should be tied to drawing revision, sample ID, test condition, material route, and buyer acceptance rule.
No. The company page separates public capability information from issued certificates, signed reports, customer-approved photos, and regulated release files. Those proof assets should only be claimed when the corresponding owned document or buyer approval exists.
Inquiry Email
Attach STEP/DXF/PDF plus frequency, flux density, sample quantity, annual forecast, and destination.
