Capabilities

OEM Capabilities

Factory-side SMC core engineering and supply capability designed for global AFPM programs, from prototype validation to repeat production.

This section is organized around the buyer journey: requirement closure, compaction tooling, sample evidence, process quality, magnetic validation, and global delivery execution.

OEM Program Control Flow

Freeze magnetic, dimensional, material, and revision baseline.
Execute SMC sample plan with measurable acceptance criteria.
Map CTQ to compaction, machining, inspection, and outgoing records.
Align tooling, forecast, packaging, and shipment execution.

Start with SMC material data, B-H curve planning, and core loss benchmarks before freezing the validation package.

OEM Evidence Scope

Prepare the audit trail before drawings or tooling move.

OEM sourcing, quality, and engineering teams need a controlled evidence path for material route, sample release, inspection records, process traceability, and export packaging.

Prepare RFQ RFQ worksheet Evidence templates

Program stage

Separate feasibility, sample, pilot, and repeat-order needs so the evidence package matches the buyer gate.

Controlled baseline

Tie drawing revision, material route, CTQ list, sample IDs, and process records to one release boundary.

Supplier record

Request inspection, validation, traceability, and shipment files that procurement and quality can actually audit.

Buyer Due Diligence Coverage

The OEM capability pages now map each service line to the evidence procurement, quality, and motor engineering teams usually request before releasing drawings, tooling POs, or pilot lots.

Capability	Audit Question	Evidence to Prepare	Buyer Value
SMC Core Manufacturing	Can the supplier control SMC powder route, compaction, heat treatment, machining, coating, and outgoing records as one process chain?	Material lot record, selected SMC route, press window notes, thermal cycle record, CTQ inspection file, and outgoing QC summary.	Shows that the supplier owns the manufacturing route instead of only brokering a shape quote.
Axial Flux Stator Prototyping	Can the prototype plan separate early geometry learning from pilot-tool assumptions?	DFM notes, sample objective, frozen CTQ dimensions, acceptable material substitutes, and prototype-to-pilot decision gate.	Helps engineering teams avoid paying for production tooling before the stator geometry is stable.
Compaction Tooling DFM	Can the supplier identify SMC tooling risks before CAD freeze?	Compaction direction review, demolding angle notes, corner radius comments, fragile-feature list, and green-strength risk log.	Reduces trial-part cracking, chipped teeth, density gradients, and late drawing loops.
Magnetic Loss Validation	Can the validation plan define frequency, flux density, waveform, temperature, and sample geometry before comparing materials?	Operating point table, test method note, sample ID, material route, density target, and report format request.	Prevents misleading pass/fail claims based on unrelated catalog data or mismatched coupons.

SMC axial flux core manufacturing and inspection facility

SMC Core Manufacturing

Manufacturing route support for custom SMC cores: material review, compaction DFM, thermal process planning, machining, coating, inspection, packaging, and prototype-to-pilot handoff.

For engineering sourcing, supplier quality, and motor R&D teams that need a China-based SMC manufacturing partner rather than a catalog-only distributor.

SMC material route review tied to drawing revision, magnetic targets, and operating condition
Compaction DFM for press direction, draft, tooth corners, density distribution, demolding, and chipping risk
Thermal process, machining allowance, coating, corrosion prevention, and export packaging planned before sample release

View details

Axial flux motor rapid prototyping samples

Axial Flux Stator Prototyping

Prototype-to-pilot support for AFPM SMC stators, including STEP/DXF review, DFM feedback, sample scope definition, first article inspection planning, and revision-controlled validation handoff.

For R&D, sourcing, and supplier quality teams moving from simulation or concept CAD into buyer-owned AFPM stator samples, measured first articles, and low-volume pilot builds.

STEP, DXF, and 2D drawing intake for buyer-owned axial flux stator designs
SMC DFM review for air-gap faces, tooth pitch, flatness, compaction direction, and winding access
Prototype sample planning that separates learning samples from pilot-intent samples

View details

Axial flux stator tooling DFM visual reference

Compaction Tooling DFM

DFM review for custom SMC compaction tooling, focused on press direction, ejection path, tooth fragility, density risk, tool ownership, sample-tool boundaries, and pilot-ready inspection evidence.

For engineering, procurement, and supplier-quality teams that need SMC-specific manufacturability review before committing buyer-owned CAD to a tooling PO.

Compaction direction, punch access, die split, and ejection review before buyer design freeze
Risk mapping for thin teeth, sharp corners, high aspect ratios, undercuts, green strength, and local density variation
Clear separation between prototype learning tools, pilot-intent tools, and production tooling assumptions

View details

SMC core validation and magnetic loss testing

Magnetic Loss Validation

Validation planning for SMC axial flux cores, tying density, dimensions, B-H curve, permeability, core loss, insulation, thermal condition, and sample-lot traceability to the buyer operating point.

For motor engineering, supplier-quality, and sourcing teams that need magnetic evidence tied to real sample conditions before approving SMC core materials, prototypes, or pilot lots.

Operating-point definition before magnetic pass/fail: frequency, flux density, waveform, temperature, duty cycle, and sample geometry
Sample-specific report boundary for density, dimensions, B-H curve, permeability, core-loss table, insulation, and thermal notes
Material comparison logic for SMC versus lamination routes without treating catalog data as project release evidence

View details

Capability Comparison Snapshot

Capability	Primary Buyer Focus	Key Metric	Why It Matters
SMC Core Manufacturing	For engineering sourcing, supplier quality, and motor R&D teams that need a China-based SMC manufacturing partner rather than a catalog-only distributor.	Process coverage: Material route, DFM, tooling, compaction, thermal process, post-process, inspection, packaging	Custom SMC parts require process ownership beyond simple shape quotation.
Axial Flux Stator Prototyping	For R&D, sourcing, and supplier quality teams moving from simulation or concept CAD into buyer-owned AFPM stator samples, measured first articles, and low-volume pilot builds.	DFM response scope: CAD intake, SMC-specific risk notes, CTQ review, sample route options, and open questions	Early DFM feedback tells engineering whether to revise geometry before spending on samples or tooling.
Compaction Tooling DFM	For engineering, procurement, and supplier-quality teams that need SMC-specific manufacturability review before committing buyer-owned CAD to a tooling PO.	DFM readiness: CAD intake, CTQ list, compaction direction review, fragile-feature map, ejection notes, and open DFM questions	SMC tooling cost and sample success depend heavily on geometry decisions made early.
Magnetic Loss Validation	For motor engineering, supplier-quality, and sourcing teams that need magnetic evidence tied to real sample conditions before approving SMC core materials, prototypes, or pilot lots.	Core loss basis: Frequency points, flux-density points, waveform, temperature state, sample geometry, and report method	A generic material datasheet is not enough for high-density AFPM motor decisions or supplier comparison.

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Email app

Attach STEP/DXF/PDF plus frequency, flux density, sample quantity, annual forecast, and destination.

Instant Chat

+8618857971991

Chat on WhatsApp

Direct response from our engineering team.